🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but block by block. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding around 200,000 votes into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president previously backed the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there existed a little resistance. However no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.